Published on:

By

Jennie Scott, 50, of Manatee County was arrested after allegedly beating her 32 year old boyfriend after a sexual encounter didn’t go the way she had hoped. After an unsuccessful effort on the part of Scott’s boyfriend Jilberto Deleon to perform joint oral sex to her satisfaction, it is claimed Scott became enraged and proceeded to hit and scratch Deleon coupling the physical abuse with threats of further beating by way of a wrench and stick. It’s reported that Deleon finished his business a bit prematurely for the drunken Scott’s liking, causing him to quit his dutiful efforts and leaving Scott unfulfilled.

Scott was arrested on December 27th by Manatee County authorities and booked initially on charges of domestic battery. She subsequently was taken back into custody after violating at least one of the conditions of her pretrial release where she remains without a bond. Depending on the circumstances surrounding the threat of a beating with a wrench, simple domestic battery could be an afterthought for Scott. Should the State have enough, they could make a case for third degree felony aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.

The Manatee County State Attorney’s Office will very likely at minimum pick up the domestic battery charge against Scott. In Florida, simple domestic battery is a first degree misdemeanor with the maximum penalty being 11 months, 29 days in jail in addition to a $1,000 fine. To make their proof, the State will have to show that there has been a battery under Florida Statute 784.03 defined as a striking of another person against their will or that an individual has caused another individual harm and such battery was between two family members or two household members per Florida Statute 741.28(2).

From a practical standpoint, domestic battery cases are some of the most difficult cases for the State to prove if for no other reason but because of the characters involved. In my experience about 75% of the time (maybe higher) the alleged victim declines to cooperate and expresses a desire for the State to drop the case. If this happens, the State can move forward regardless of the victim’s wishes but it makes it extremely difficult to convict when your best witness won’t play ball.
Continue reading →

Published on:

By

Former Atlanta Braves superstar Andruw Jones was arrested on Christmas day by police in Gwinnett County Georgia, accused of domestic battery against his wife, Nicole Jones. Nicole Jones is said to have told officers that when she asked her husband to help prepare their house for Christmas morning, the battery ensued. During the scuffle Jones claims she tried to escape up the stairs but was caught by Andruw Jones who drug her down the stairs by her ankle. Upon catching his wife, it is alleged Andruw Jones got on top of her and said, “I want to kill you.” Other reports indicate Andruw Jones grabbed his wife by her neck.

Unfortunately domestic battery is an all too frequent occurrence in our country whether it is a founded account or a false accusation. Regardless of the State authorities always take allegations of this nature seriously and generally an arrest is made. Depending on which news report mentioned above is more accurate as to what actually happened, Jones could be charged with either a felony or misdemeanor were this incident in Florida.

For purposes of simple domestic battery in Florida, all one really need to look at is whether there has been a battery committed against a family or household member by another family or household member. This is found in Florida Statute 741.28(2) under the “domestic violence” definition. For a simple battery to occur under Florida Statute 784.03, the State must show that there has been an actual and intentional touching or striking of another person against their will or that someone has caused someone else bodily harm. So, in short, take the battery elements listed and make a finding that the participants were, as in this case, family members, and you have a domestic violence situation in Florida punishable as a first degree misdemeanor.
Continue reading →

Published on:

By

15 year old Lakeland, Florida girl, Cassidy Goodson avoided life imprisonment and a first degree murder charge this week by accepting a reduced plea offer of manslaughter. In accepting the plea offer Goodson will face a sentence of at least 18 months in a juvenile state facility. Goodson was arrested in September after giving birth to a 9.5 pound baby boy. Apparently Goodson’s parents knew nothing of the pregnancy and Goodson was able to have the child in a bathroom of her parents’ home. Upon giving birth Goodson told police that she then strangled her son and put him in a shoebox to further conceal the incident. Ultimately Goodson’s mother found the deceased infant in some laundry and called local authorities.

When questioned by police Goodson described the scene in that she turned on the bathroom water to cover any noise of the birth and delivered the infant into a toilet, checked for a pulse, and ultimately proceeded to asphyxiate the child. An autopsy performed on the infant confirmed the cause of death.

Originally when Cassidy Goodson was arrested there was an intent, at least facially, by the Polk County State Attorney’s Office to charge her with first degree murder as an adult, while seeking life imprisonment. This in fact was the case up and until Goodson’s criminal defense attorney was able to negotiate a plea deal reducing the charge to manslaughter and allowing her child client to serve a sentence as a minor. Though manslaughter is an extremely serious charge, this is a very good deal for Goodson and both the prosecutor and criminal defense lawyer should be commended for their hard work.
Continue reading →

Published on:

By

A criminal court in the Czech Republic indicted “Lamb of God” lead singer Randy Blythe for their country’s version of manslaughter, or causing bodily harm to another person with lethal consequences. The 41 year old Blythe is accused of pushing a fan from the Lamb of God stage during a 2007 concert. As a result of the push the fan hit his head on a concrete floor below causing his death two weeks later. Under Czech speedy trial rules, Blythe’s trial date must be set within 3 months presumably from indictment. If convicted, Blythe will face between five and ten years in prison.

Just about every media outlet describes the incident as one where Lamb of God was performing on stage and due to either lax venue security, insufficient barricading, or both, this fan was able to trespass onto the band’s stage. Once the fan accessed the stage he proceeded swiftly toward Blythe who reacted and pushed him away. The unfortunate consequence of death resulted from the push.

So we know someone died and someone else has been accused of causing that death in a fashion not premeditated. Will the charges stick and should they? Generally a “manslaughter” charge is very similar state to state and in most civilized countries not using some type of religiously fanatical court. In its most stripped down form it is the killing of a human being by the act, procurement, or culpable negligence of someone else, without lawful justification according to the justifiable use of force statute and in cases in which such killing should not be excusable homicide or murder. The Florida manslaughter statute is codified at 782.07 if you’d like to take a further look. Manslaughter without any type of aggravating factor is a second degree felony punishable by up to 15 years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

The key portion of the statute to focus on is the language “without lawful justification.” Obviously the killing of another without a reason is illegal. However, if someone appears ready to inflict some type of physical harm upon you, you have a right to defend yourself. Stated differently, you have lawful justification. Blythe’s case will rise and fall on whether the trier of fact believes his assertion of self defense is justified.
Continue reading →

Published on:

By

Tampa, Florida teenager Jared Cano’s life as he knows it is over. Today in Hillsborough County Circuit Court in Tampa, Florida, Jared Cano was sentenced to 15 years in the Florida Department of Corrections for what police say was a plot to make a Columbine style attack on Freedom High School. Tampa police were tipped to Cano’s plans by a fellow Freedom High student. In following the tip, police found materials used to make bombs in addition to a timer presumed to be used to detonate the bomb. Additionally, several news agencies were able to get their hands on disturbing cell phone videos taken by Cano describing his heinous intentions. Cano’s Tampa criminal attorney contested the allegations, stating that the plans were nothing more than fantasies of a teenager and that Cano never planned on following through with his scheme.

After an expert hired by the Tampa criminal lawyer opined that there was nothing seized as evidence that would explode, Hillsborough Circuit Judge Kimberly Fernandez sentenced Cano to 15 years in the Florida Department of Corrections to be followed by 10 years of felony probation. Cano has 15 months of credit for time served in jail but will have to serve out 85% of his sentence under current Florida law.

Cano was convicted under Florida Statute 790.162 for threatening to discharge a destructive device and under Florida Statute 790.161(2) for attempting to discharge a destructive device.

To be convicted of threatening to discharge a destructive device under 790.162, the State Attorney’s Office must show that the individual charged threatened to discharge a destructive device with an intent to do bodily harm to any person or that the individual has an intent to damage property of any person. If convicted as Cano was, one would be looking at a second degree felony conviction, punishable by up to 15 years in prison and a $10,000 fine.
Continue reading →

Published on:

By

Clearwater Police Lieutenant Richard Crean is under investigation by the Clearwater, Florida police department for allegedly using a police database illegally. As the basis of the investigation, Lt. Crean is accused of using the database to obtain the personal information of a woman linked to Laura McLynas’ estranged husband James McLynas. Lt. Crean is said to have retrieved certain demographic information on Harwell in abuse of his police duties and turning that information over to Laura McLynas. Harwell claims the information has been used to harass her and entangle her in an ongoing, turbulent custody battle between James and Laura McLynas.

Oddly enough, from what I’ve read it appears the allegation is that Lt. Crean obtained no information of an overly sensitive nature. I understand the information allegedly gathered to be a name, address and date of birth; all things our good friends at Google likely could have provided. I don’t believe Lt. Crean, if charged with this crime is guilty of a heinous spill of sensitive information that could cause financial injury. If he did in fact obtain this information illegally, his actions wholly fly in the face of what “we the people” must have and deserve of our police officers, honesty and integrity. That’s not to say that if he did it he’s not an honest and good officer. The police are people too and people make mistakes. In his situation, if he did it, he will likely suffer a stiffer burden than most in that he would likely lose his career.

Florida Statute 815.06(1) is very likely the statute at issue in this allegation. This statute states in pertinent part,

“Whoever willfully, knowingly, and without authorization:

(a) Accesses or causes to be accessed any computer, computer system, or computer network…. commits a felony of the third degree.

I am unsure as to how the Police or State Attorney’s Office realized that Lt. Crean is allegedly responsible for this illegally obtained information. If he made an admission or Laura McLynas made a statement that he did it, he very likely will be charged. My previous paragraph mentioned damages to the victim. Damages, with respect to this charge, are completely irrelevant. This is very much a policy oriented law. With respect to police departments it almost has to be enforced if for nothing else but to send a message that police meddling won’t be tolerated.
Continue reading →

Published on:

By

A mother of two young boys and their grandmother are facing serious charges for making a 1 year old and a 5 year old little boy pose for pictures with marijuana. Leslie County, Kentucky deputies allege that grandmother Beth Hensley and mother Tracey Hensley took pictures of the two boys with marijuana joints and a large marijuana bud near their faces. The picture of each boy with the joint shows the joint in the boys’ mouth while someone appears to be trying to light it. Grandmother, Beth Hensley, was reported to authorities after attempting to have the pictures developed at her local Rite-Aid.

Beth Hensley is currently facing trafficking marijuana, possession of marijuana, and cultivating marijuana charges. Tracey Hensley is currently facing similar charges in addition to endangering the welfare of a minor and unlawful transaction with a minor. As to be expected, the children were removed from the home by social services and placed in the care of a relative. When questioned by police, the sagely mother-daughter duo explained that the joint was not filled with marijuana from the gigantic bud in other pictures, but rather they were going John Wayne style and smoking a large cigarette full of Prince Albert tobacco. Yes, totally believable. When ultimately questioned as to their motive for this exotic photo shoot, mother of the year Tracey Hensley responded that “it was just something to show them later on in a picture album how crazy their grandma was.” Crazy indeed.

Ladies, ladies, ladies. Not the best idea you’ve ever had. Not only are you facing ridiculously serious charges, it may be tough to get those kids back in your care. As Floridians we’re used to “weird news” so things like this should come as no surprise. In fact, our Tampa criminal lawyers represented an individual with similar facts who accidentally sent his kid to school with marijuana and scales in the kid’s backpack. If one were to reenact Miss Kentucky and Miss Kentucky runner up’s tomfoolery in Florida, they could face similar charges.
Continue reading →

Published on:

By

In special remembrance of Elizabeth Macias and her 2011 Black Friday pepper spray incident, we’ll run through the dos and don’ts for the busiest shopping day of the year in the hope that you’ll stay out of a Tampa Bay area jail. As you may recall from last year, Macias was accused of unleashing a hellfire fury of pepper spray on other Black Friday shoppers in Porter Ranch, California. Initially police claimed Macias hosed down her shop mates over discounted X-Box gaming systems. After the “spray” settled Macias faced no felony charges and ultimately threatened to sue Wal Mart for inadequate security. At the end of the day the failure to file charges isn’t overly surprising if there was in fact a scrum around the X-Box’s and there was a risk of injury to her or her children. It would be tough for a prosecutor to show she wasn’t happily hosing others in self defense or defense of her kids. We hope you find the following tips helpful in avoiding Machine Gun Macias’ fate.

Don’t use pepper spray on other people. If you do in Tampa, Florida you will face at minimum, a battery charge and perhaps and aggravated battery if the spray causes permanent injury to another. All that is necessary to show a battery is that you intentionally touched or struck someone else against his or her will, OR intentionally caused bodily harm to someone else. No one I know enjoys being doused with pepper spray so chances are if you break out the water weenie full of pepper juice, you’re guilty of battery. For an excellent explanation of assault and battery check this Jacksonville criminal attorney‘s write up.

Where things could get really serious is if your pepper spray causes permanent harm to a third party. If you hit someone in the eye and said eye is permanently broken, you’re going to face second degree felony charges for a Florida aggravated battery. Aggravated battery charges generally mean prison time. I’ve never been to prison but I’ve been told the selection at commissary isn’t quite as nice as Target. Food for thought.

Don’t threaten someone whether you have pepper spray to back up your threat or not. In Florida, if you threaten someone by word or act and have the immediate ability to do so coupled with an overt act that leads them to believe you’re about to make bad dreams come true, you my friend, have committed an assault. Assault is a second degree misdemeanor punishable by up to 60 days in jail and a $500 fine. Possibly worse is the fact that your shopping day will be done.
Continue reading →

Published on:

By

Douglas Kennedy, son of former Senator and United States Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, was acquitted Tuesday of harassment and child endangerment charges in New York. Kennedy, also the nephew of former President John F. Kennedy, was accused in January of kicking a nurse in the pelvis and twisting another nurse’s arm as he was attempting to take his newborn son from the maternity ward to get some “fresh air.”

The entire incident was recorded by a security at Northern Westchester Hospital. Cari Luciano, one of the alleged victim nurses, testified that as Kennedy attempted to get to the stairwell of the hospital, his baby’s head was jostled and unsupported. Luciano testified that she instinctively reached out to steady the baby when Kennedy kicked her in the pelvis. Marian Williams, an eyewitness nurse, testified that Kennedy’s kick met with “such force” that it knocked Luciano off her feet.

Kennedy’s case really alleges nothing more than a battery charge, coupled with New York’s specific version of a child abuse or child neglect charge. Using Florida law for our analysis, battery would be the only charge applicable under the facts as reported in the Kennedy news story.

First to address and then discount an allegation of abuse or neglect to the infant, the only statute under Florida law that would be applicable to this factual scenario would be Florida Statute 827.03. First, there is no reasonable allegation of child abuse as there is absolutely no willful or intentional act to cause harm to this child. Kennedy is said to have taken his child into his arms in an effort to take the child outside for some fresh air. Nothing is reported that could support a charge that he, by some purposeful act, abused the child or put the child in a situation that could reasonably be said to cause harm. Simple “alleged” head jostling won’t cut it. More is needed to support a child abuse charge.
Continue reading →

Published on:

By

Waynesboro, Virginia Police smelled a little more than the odor of an alcoholic beverage when they pulled over and detained Efrain Moreno Alvarez earlier this week for suspicion of driving under the influence. The smell? Skunk. Not as in skunky, over the hill beer. Real skunk. Like, call in the Turtle Man to capture the rascal before he yucks up the neighborhood, skunk!

On November 11th Sgt. Brian Edwards, a member of the Waynesboro Police Department, witnessed an older Chevy Lumina strike a guardrail while travelling on Interstate 64. After a little more erratic driving Sgt. Edwards eventually detained the driver, Efrain Moreno Alavarez. This is there things went downhill in a hurry. When officers approached the vehicle Alvarez was travelling in, they were overcome by the unmistakable smell of skunk.

Somehow, some way, officers were able to smell an odor of alcohol on Alvarez. This, amongst other observed signs of impairment, led them to request field sobriety exercises which Alvarez failed leading to his arrest. Ultimately Alvarez submitted to testing which showed a blood alcohol content of .15. The legal blood alcohol limit in every state is .08.
Continue reading →

Contact Information
Mayberry Law Firm
3902 Henderson Blvd, #208-136
Tampa, FL 33629
Phone: (813) 444-7435

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2015 – 2025, Mayberry Law Firm
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design